Open-world embodied agents must solve long-horizon tasks where the main bottleneck is not single-step planning quality but how interaction experience is organized and evolved. To this end, we present Steve-Evolving, a non-parametric self-evolving framework that tightly couples fine-grained execution diagnosis with dual-track knowledge distillation in a closed loop. The method follows three phases: Experience Anchoring, Experience Distillation, and Knowledge-Driven Closed-Loop Control. In detail, Experience Anchoring solidifies each subgoal attempt into a structured experience tuple with a fixed schema (pre-state, action, diagnosis-result, and post-state) and organizes it in a three-tier experience space with multi-dimensional indices (e.g., condition signatures, spatial hashing, and semantic tags) plus rolling summarization for efficient and auditable recall. To ensure sufficient information density for attribution, the execution layer provides compositional diagnosis signals beyond binary outcomes, including state-difference summaries, enumerated failure causes, continuous indicators, and stagnation/loop detection. Moreover, successful trajectories of Experience Distillation are generalized into reusable skills with explicit preconditions and verification criteria, while failures are distilled into executable guardrails that capture root causes and forbid risky operations at both subgoal and task granularities. Besides, Knowledge-Driven Closed-Loop Control retrieved skills and guardrails are injected into an LLM planner, and diagnosis-triggered local replanning updates the active constraints online, forming a continual evolution process without any model parameter updates. Experiments on the long-horizon suite of Minecraft MCU demonstrate consistent improvements over static-retrieval baselines.
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are increasingly applied to complex, multi-step tasks that require interaction with diverse external tools across various domains. However, current LLM agent tool planning methods typically rely on greedy, reactive tool selection strategies that lack foresight and fail to account for inter-tool dependencies. In this paper, we present ToolTree, a novel Monte Carlo tree search-inspired planning paradigm for tool planning. ToolTree explores possible tool usage trajectories using a dual-stage LLM evaluation and bidirectional pruning mechanism that enables the agent to make informed, adaptive decisions over extended tool-use sequences while pruning less promising branches before and after the tool execution. Empirical evaluations across both open-set and closed-set tool planning tasks on 4 benchmarks demonstrate that ToolTree consistently improves performance while keeping the highest efficiency, achieving an average gain of around 10\% compared to the state-of-the-art planning paradigm.
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models increasingly adopt chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, generating a natural-language plan before decoding motor commands. This internal text channel between the reasoning module and the action decoder has received no adversarial scrutiny. We ask: which properties of this intermediate plan does the action decoder actually rely on, and can targeted corruption of the reasoning trace alone -- with all inputs left intact -- degrade a robot's physical task performance? We design a taxonomy of seven text corruptions organized into three attacker tiers (blind noise, mechanical-semantic, and LLM-adaptive) and apply them to a state-of-the-art reasoning VLA across 40 LIBERO tabletop manipulation tasks. Our results reveal a striking asymmetry: substituting object names in the reasoning trace reduces overall success rate by 8.3~percentage points (pp) -- reaching $-$19.3~pp on goal-conditioned tasks and $-$45~pp on individual tasks -- whereas sentence reordering, spatial-direction reversal, token noise, and even a 70B-parameter LLM crafting plausible-but-wrong plans all have negligible impact (within $\pm$4~pp). This asymmetry indicates that the action decoder depends on entity-reference integrity rather than reasoning quality or sequential structure. Notably, a sophisticated LLM-based attacker underperforms simple mechanical object-name substitution, because preserving plausibility inadvertently retains the entity-grounding structure the decoder needs. A cross-architecture control using a non-reasoning VLA confirms the vulnerability is exclusive to reasoning-augmented models, while instruction-level attacks degrade both architectures -- establishing that the internal reasoning trace is a distinct and stealthy threat vector invisible to input-validation defenses.
Developing autonomous agents for web-based tasks is a core challenge in AI. While Large Language Model (LLM) agents can interpret complex user requests, they often operate as black boxes, making it difficult to diagnose why they fail or how they plan. This paper addresses this gap by formally treating web tasks as sequential decision-making processes. We introduce a taxonomy that maps modern agent architectures to traditional planning paradigms: Step-by-Step agents to Breadth-First Search (BFS), Tree Search agents to Best-First Tree Search, and Full-Plan-in-Advance agents to Depth-First Search (DFS). This framework allows for a principled diagnosis of system failures like context drift and incoherent task decomposition. To evaluate these behaviors, we propose five novel evaluation metrics that assess trajectory quality beyond simple success rates. We support this analysis with a new dataset of 794 human-labeled trajectories from the WebArena benchmark. Finally, we validate our evaluation framework by comparing a baseline Step-by-Step agent against a novel Full-Plan-in-Advance implementation. Our results reveal that while the Step-by-Step agent aligns more closely with human gold trajectories (38% overall success), the Full-Plan-in-Advance agent excels in technical measures such as element accuracy (89%), demonstrating the necessity of our proposed metrics for selecting appropriate agent architectures based on specific application constraints.
Assistive robotics is an important subarea of robotics that focuses on the well-being of people with disabilities. A robotic guide dog is an assistive quadruped robot that helps visually impaired people in obstacle avoidance and navigation. Enabling language capabilities for robotic guide dogs goes beyond naively adding an existing dialog system onto a mobile robot. The novel challenges include grounding language in the dynamically changing environment and improving spatial awareness for the human handler. To address those challenges, we develop a novel dialog system for robotic guide dogs that uses LLMs to verbalize both navigational plans and scenes. The goal is to enable verbal communication for collaborative decision-making within the handler-robot team. In experiments, we conducted a human study to evaluate different verbalization strategies and a simulation study to assess the efficiency and accuracy in navigation tasks.
Existing end-to-end autonomous driving models rely heavily on purely data-driven inductive reasoning. This "black-box" nature leads to a lack of interpretability and absolute safety guarantees in complex, long-tail scenarios. To overcome this bottleneck, we propose a novel neuro-symbolic trajectory planning framework that seamlessly integrates rigorous deductive reasoning into end-to-end neural networks. Specifically, our framework utilizes a Large Language Model (LLM) to dynamically extract scene rules and employs an Answer Set Programming (ASP) solver for deterministic logical arbitration, generating safe and traceable discrete driving decisions. To bridge the gap between discrete symbols and continuous trajectories, we introduce a decision-conditioned decoding mechanism that transforms high-level logical decisions into learnable embedding vectors, simultaneously constraining the planning query and the physical initial velocity of a differentiable Kinematic Bicycle Model (KBM). By combining KBM-generated physical baseline trajectories with neural residual corrections, our approach inherently guarantees kinematic feasibility while ensuring a high degree of transparency. On the nuScenes benchmark, our method comprehensively outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline MomAD, reducing the L2 mean error to 0.57 m, decreasing the collision rate to 0.075%, and optimizing trajectory prediction consistency (TPC) to 0.47 m.
Human mobility studies how people move among meaningful places over time and how these movements aggregate into population-level patterns that shape accessibility, congestion, emissions, and public health. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in this domain because many human mobility problems require reasoning about place and activity semantics, travelers' intentions and preferences, and diverse real-world constraints that are difficult to capture using coordinates and other purely numerical attributes. Despite rapid growth, the literature is still scattered, and there is no clear overview that connects human mobility tasks, challenges, and LLM designs in a consistent way. This survey therefore provides a comprehensive synthesis of LLM-based research on human mobility across five tasks, including travel itinerary planning, trajectory generation, mobility simulation, mobility prediction, and mobility semantics and understanding. For each task, we review representative work, connect core challenges to the specific roles of LLMs, and summarize typical LLM-based solution designs. We conclude with open challenges and research directions toward reliable, grounded and privacy-aware LLM-based approaches for human mobility.
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in code generation, yet their potential for generating kernels specifically for mobile de- vices remains largely unexplored. In this work, we extend the scope of automated kernel generation to the mobile domain to investigate the central question: Can LLMs write efficient kernels for mobile devices? To enable systematic investigation, we introduce MobileKernelBench, a comprehensive evaluation framework comprising a benchmark prioritizing operator diversity and cross-framework interoperability, coupled with an automated pipeline that bridges the host-device gap for on-device verification. Leveraging this framework, we conduct extensive evaluation on the CPU backend of Mobile Neural Network (MNN), revealing that current LLMs struggle with the engineering complexity and data scarcity inher-ent to mobile frameworks; standard models and even fine-tuned variants exhibit high compilation failure rates (over 54%) and negligible performance gains due to hallucinations and a lack of domain-specific grounding. To overcome these limitations, we propose the Mobile K ernel A gent (MoKA), a multi-agent system equipped with repository-aware reasoning and a plan-and-execute paradigm.Validated on MobileKernelBench, MoKA achieves state-of-the-art performance, boosting compilation success to 93.7% and enabling 27.4% of generated kernelsto deliver measurable speedups over native libraries.
Human motion is highly expressive and naturally aligned with language, yet prevailing methods relying heavily on joint text-motion embeddings struggle to synthesize temporally accurate, detailed motions and often lack explainability. To address these limitations, we introduce LabanLite, a motion representation developed by adapting and extending the Labanotation system. Unlike black-box text-motion embeddings, LabanLite encodes each atomic body-part action (e.g., a single left-foot step) as a discrete Laban symbol paired with a textual template. This abstraction decomposes complex motions into interpretable symbol sequences and body-part instructions, establishing a symbolic link between high-level language and low-level motion trajectories. Building on LabanLite, we present LaMoGen, a Text-to-LabanLite-to-Motion Generation framework that enables large language models (LLMs) to compose motion sequences through symbolic reasoning. The LLM interprets motion patterns, relates them to textual descriptions, and recombines symbols into executable plans, producing motions that are both interpretable and linguistically grounded. To support rigorous evaluation, we introduce a Labanotation-based benchmark with structured description-motion pairs and three metrics that jointly measure text-motion alignment across symbolic, temporal, and harmony dimensions. Experiments demonstrate that LaMoGen establishes a new baseline for both interpretability and controllability, outperforming prior methods on our benchmark and two public datasets. These results highlight the advantages of symbolic reasoning and agent-based design for language-driven motion synthesis.
Chemotherapy for cancer treatment is costly and accompanied by severe side effects, highlighting the critical need for early prediction of treatment outcomes to improve patient management and informed decision-making. Predictive models for chemotherapy outcomes using real-world data face challenges, including the absence of explicit phenotypes and treatment outcome labels such as cancer progression and toxicity. This study addresses these challenges by employing Large Language Models (LLMs) and ontology-based techniques for phenotypes and outcome label extraction from patient notes. We focused on one of the most frequently occurring cancers, breast cancer, due to its high prevalence and significant variability in patient response to treatment, making it a critical area for improving predictive modeling. The dataset included features such as vitals, demographics, staging, biomarkers, and performance scales. Drug regimens and their combinations were extracted from the chemotherapy plans in the EMR data and shortlisted based on NCCN guidelines, verified with NIH standards, and analyzed through survival modeling. The proposed approach significantly reduced phenotypes sparsity and improved predictive accuracy. Random Survival Forest was used to predict time-to-failure, achieving a C-index of 73%, and utilized as a classifier at a specific time point to predict treatment outcomes, with accuracy and F1 scores above 70%. The outcome probabilities were validated for reliability by calibration curves. We extended our approach to four other cancer types. This research highlights the potential of early prediction of treatment outcomes using LLM-based clinical data extraction enabling personalized treatment plans with better patient outcomes.
With increasing demand for mass customization, traditional manufacturing robots that rely on rule-based operations lack the flexibility to accommodate customized or new product variants. Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) has demonstrated potential to improve system adaptability by leveraging human versatility and decision-making capabilities. However, existing HRC frame- works typically depend on predefined perception-manipulation pipelines, limiting their ability to autonomously generate task plans for new product assembly. In this work, we propose CoViLLM, an adaptive human-robot collaborative assembly frame- work that supports the assembly of customized and previously unseen products. CoViLLM combines depth-camera-based localization for object position estimation, human operator classification for identifying new components, and an Large Language Model (LLM) for assembly task planning based on natural language instructions. The framework is validated on the NIST Assembly Task Board for known, customized, and new product cases. Experimental results show that the proposed framework enables flexible collaborative assembly by extending HRC beyond predefined product and task settings.
We present Verified Multi-Agent Orchestration (VMAO), a framework that coordinates specialized LLM-based agents through a verification-driven iterative loop. Given a complex query, our system decomposes it into a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of sub-questions, executes them through domain-specific agents in parallel, verifies result completeness via LLM-based evaluation, and adaptively replans to address gaps. The key contributions are: (1) dependency-aware parallel execution over a DAG of sub-questions with automatic context propagation, (2) verification-driven adaptive replanning that uses an LLM-based verifier as an orchestration-level coordination signal, and (3) configurable stop conditions that balance answer quality against resource usage. On 25 expert-curated market research queries, VMAO improves answer completeness from 3.1 to 4.2 and source quality from 2.6 to 4.1 (1-5 scale) compared to a single-agent baseline, demonstrating that orchestration-level verification is an effective mechanism for multi-agent quality assurance.
Millimeter-wave or terahertz communications can meet demands of low-altitude economy networks for high-throughput sensing and real-time decision making. However, high-frequency characteristics of wireless channels result in severe propagation loss and strong beam directivity, which make beam prediction challenging in highly mobile uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAV) scenarios. In this paper, we employ agentic AI to enable the transformation of mmWave base stations toward embodied intelligence. We innovatively design a multi-agent collaborative reasoning architecture for UAV-to-ground mmWave communications and propose a hybrid beam prediction model system based on bimodal data. The multi-agent architecture is designed to overcome the limited context window and weak controllability of large language model (LLM)-based reasoning by decomposing beam prediction into task analysis, solution planning, and completeness assessment. To align with the agentic reasoning process, a hybrid beam prediction model system is developed to process multimodal UAV data, including numeric mobility information and visual observations. The proposed hybrid model system integrates Mamba-based temporal modelling, convolutional visual encoding, and cross-attention-based multimodal fusion, and dynamically switches data-flow strategies under multi-agent guidance. Extensive simulations on a real UAV mmWave communication dataset demonstrate that proposed architecture and system achieve high prediction accuracy and robustness under diverse data conditions, with maximum top-1 accuracy reaching 96.57%.
In dynamic open-world environments, autonomous agents often encounter novelties that hinder their ability to find plans to achieve their goals. Specifically, traditional symbolic planners fail to generate plans when the robot's planning domain lacks the operators that enable it to interact appropriately with novel objects in the environment. We propose a neuro-symbolic architecture that integrates symbolic planning, reinforcement learning, and a large language model (LLM) to learn how to handle novel objects. In particular, we leverage the common sense reasoning capability of the LLM to identify missing operators, generate plans with the symbolic AI planner, and write reward functions to guide the reinforcement learning agent in learning control policies for newly identified operators. Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in operator discovery as well as operator learning in continuous robotic domains.
Short-video platforms are closed-loop, human-in-the-loop ecosystems where platform policy, creator incentives, and user behavior co-evolve. This feedback structure makes counterfactual policy evaluation difficult in production, especially for long-horizon and distributional outcomes. The challenge is amplified as platforms deploy AI tools that change what content enters the system, how agents adapt, and how the platform operates. We propose a large language model (LLM)-augmented digital twin for short-video platforms, with a modular four-twin architecture (User, Content, Interaction, Platform) and an event-driven execution layer that supports reproducible experimentation. Platform policies are implemented as pluggable components within the Platform Twin, and LLMs are integrated as optional, schema-constrained decision services (e.g., persona generation, content captioning, campaign planning, trend prediction) that are routed through a unified optimizer. This design enables scalable simulations that preserve closed-loop dynamics while allowing selective LLM adoption, enabling the study of platform policies, including AI-enabled policies, under realistic feedback and constraints.
Medication errors pose a significant threat to patient safety, making pharmacist verification (PV) a critical, yet heavily burdened, final safeguard. The direct application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to this zero-tolerance domain is untenable due to their inherent factual unreliability, lack of traceability, and weakness in complex reasoning. To address these challenges, we introduce PharmGraph-Auditor, a novel system designed for safe and evidence-grounded prescription auditing. The core of our system is a trustworthy Hybrid Pharmaceutical Knowledge Base (HPKB), implemented under the Virtual Knowledge Graph (VKG) paradigm. This architecture strategically unifies a relational component for set constraint satisfaction and a graph component for topological reasoning via a rigorous mapping layer. To construct this HPKB, we propose the Iterative Schema Refinement (ISR) algorithm, a framework that enables the co-evolution of both graph and relational schemas from medical texts. For auditing, we introduce the KB-grounded Chain of Verification (CoV), a new reasoning paradigm that transforms the LLM from an unreliable generator into a transparent reasoning engine. CoV decomposes the audit task into a sequence of verifiable queries against the HPKB, generating hybrid query plans to retrieve evidence from the most appropriate data store. Experimental results demonstrate robust knowledge extraction capabilities and show promises of using PharmGraph-Auditor to enable pharmacists to achieve safer and faster prescription verification.
Reinforcement learning (RL) finetuning has become a key technique for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). However, its effectiveness critically depends on the selection of training data. Recent advances underscore the importance of online prompt selection methods, which typically concentrate training on partially solved or moderately challenging examples under the current policy, thereby yielding more effective model updates. While significantly accelerating RL finetuning in terms of training steps, they also incur substantial computational overhead by requiring extensive LLM rollouts over large candidate batches to identify informative samples, an expense that can outweigh the finetuning process itself. To address this challenge, this work proposes Dynamics-Predictive Sampling (DPS), which online predicts and selects informative prompts by inferring their learning dynamics prior to costly rollouts. Specifically, we introduce a new perspective by modeling each prompt's solving progress during RL finetuning as a dynamical system, where the extent of solving is represented as the state and the transition is characterized by a hidden Markov model. Using historical rollout reward signals, we perform online Bayesian inference to estimate evolving state distributions, and the inference outcome provides a predictive prior for efficient prompt selection without rollout-intensive filtering. Empirical results across diverse reasoning tasks, including mathematics, planning, and visual geometry, demonstrate that DPS substantially reduces redundant rollouts, accelerates the training process, and achieves superior reasoning performance.
When faced with data problems, many data workers cannot articulate their information need precisely enough for software to help. Although LLMs interpret natural-language requests, they behave brittly when intent is under-specified, e.g., hallucinating fields, assuming join paths, or producing ungrounded answers. We present Pneuma-Seeker, a system built around a central idea: relational reification. Pneuma-Seeker represents a user's evolving information need as a relational schema: a concrete, analysis-ready data model shared between user and system. Rather than answering prompts directly, Pneuma-Seeker iteratively refines this schema, then discovers and prepares relevant sources to construct a relation and executable program that compute the answer. Pneuma-Seeker employs an LLM-powered agentic architecture with conductor-style planning and macro- and micro-level context management to operate effectively over heterogeneous relational corpora. We evaluate Pneuma-Seeker across multiple domains against state-of-the-art academic and industrial baselines, demonstrating higher answer accuracy. Deployment in a real organization highlights trust and inspectability as essential requirements for LLM-mediated data systems.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in code generation, they often struggle with the deep, long-horizon reasoning required for complex software engineering. We attribute this limitation to the nature of standard pre-training data: static software repositories represent only the terminal state of an intricate intellectual process, abstracting away the intermediate planning, debugging, and iterative refinement. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel paradigm: understanding via reconstruction. We hypothesize that reverse-engineering the latent agentic trajectories -- the planning, reasoning, and debugging steps -- behind static repositories provides a far richer supervision signal than raw code alone. To operationalize this, we introduce a framework that synthesizes these trajectories using a multi-agent simulation. This process is grounded in the structural realities of the source repositories (e.g., dependency graphs and file hierarchies) to ensure fidelity. Furthermore, to guarantee the logical rigor of the synthetic data, we employ a search-based optimization technique that iteratively refines the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to maximize the likelihood of the ground-truth code. Empirical results demonstrate that continuous pre-training on these reconstructed trajectories significantly enhances Llama-3-8B's performance across diverse benchmarks, including long-context understanding, coding proficiency, and agentic capabilities.
Artificial intelligence has advanced significantly through the development of intelligent game-playing systems, providing rigorous testbeds for decision-making, strategic planning, and adaptive learning. However, resource-constrained environments pose critical challenges, as conventional deep learning methods heavily rely on extensive datasets and computational resources. In this paper, we propose a lightweight hybrid framework for the Game of the Amazons, which explores the paradigm of weak-to-strong generalization by integrating the structural reasoning of graph-based learning with the generative capabilities of large language models. Specifically, we leverage a Graph Attention Autoencoder to inform a multi-step Monte Carlo Tree Search, utilize a Stochastic Graph Genetic Algorithm to optimize evaluation signals, and harness GPT-4o-mini to generate synthetic training data. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on expert demonstrations, our framework learns from noisy and imperfect supervision. We demonstrate that the Graph Attention mechanism effectively functions as a structural filter, denoising the LLM's outputs. Experiments on a 10$\times$10 Amazons board show that our hybrid approach not only achieves a 15\%--56\% improvement in decision accuracy over baselines but also significantly outperforms its teacher model (GPT-4o-mini), achieving a competitive win rate of 45.0\% at N=30 nodes and a decisive 66.5\% at only N=50 nodes. These results verify the feasibility of evolving specialized, high-performance game AI from general-purpose foundation models under stringent computational constraints.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated AI-assisted software development, yet practical deployment remains constrained by incomplete implementations, weak modularization, and inconsistent security practices. We introduce Questions-of-Thoughts (QoT), a quality-driven inference-time scaffold that turns a user goal into (i) an ordered sequence of engineering steps and (ii) stepwise self-questioning to verify constraints and reduce omission errors, while maintaining a lightweight reasoning record that stabilizes subsequent design decisions. We evaluate QoT across three representative backend engineering domains: API Design, Data Communication, and File Systems. Each task requires multi-module decomposition and exposes standard failure modes in LLM-generated systems. To enable data-driven comparison, we score generated artifacts using an ISO/IEC-inspired quality rubric that measures Scalability, Completeness, Modularity, and Security. We report domain-wise gains as the change in total quality score, defined as the QoT score minus the NoQoT score. Results show capacity-dependent improvements: QoT yields consistent quality improvements for larger models and more complex domains, while smaller models may exhibit trade-offs under tight context and planning budgets. We release an open artifact with prompts, scoring guidelines, raw generations, and scripts that reproduce the reported tables and figures to support applied AI and data analytics research.
Autonomous AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, where reliable and robust behavior is critical. However, existing agent evaluation frameworks either rely heavily on manual efforts, operate within simulated environments, or lack focus on testing complex, multimodal, real-world agents. We introduce SpecOps, a novel, fully automated testing framework designed to evaluate GUI-based AI agents in real-world environments. SpecOps decomposes the testing process into four specialized phases - test case generation, environment setup, test execution, and validation - each handled by a distinct LLM-based specialist agent. This structured architecture addresses key challenges including end-to-end task coherence, robust error handling, and adaptability across diverse agent platforms including CLI tools, web apps, and browser extensions. In comprehensive evaluations across five diverse real-world agents, SpecOps outperforms baselines including general-purpose agentic systems such as AutoGPT and LLM-crafted automation scripts in planning accuracy, execution success, and bug detection effectiveness. SpecOps identifies 164 true bugs in the real-world agents with an F1 score of 0.89. With a cost of under 0.73 USD and a runtime of under eight minutes per test, it demonstrates its practical viability and superiority in automated, real-world agent testing.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized recommendation agents by providing superior reasoning and flexible decision-making capabilities. However, existing methods mainly follow a passive information acquisition paradigm, where agents either rely on static pre-defined workflows or perform reasoning with constrained information. It limits the agent's ability to identify information sufficiency, often leading to suboptimal recommendations when faced with fragmented user profiles or sparse item metadata. To address these limitations, we propose RecThinker, an agentic framework for tool-augmented reasoning in recommendation, which shifts recommendation from passive processing to autonomous investigation by dynamically planning reasoning paths and proactively acquiring essential information via autonomous tool-use. Specifically, RecThinker adopts an Analyze-Plan-Act paradigm, which first analyzes the sufficiency of user-item information and autonomously invokes tool-calling sequences to bridge information gaps between available knowledge and reasoning requirements. We develop a suite of specialized tools for RecThinker, enabling the model to acquire user-side, item-side, and collaborative information for better reasoning and user-item matching. Furthermore, we introduce a self-augmented training pipeline, comprising a Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) stage to internalize high-quality reasoning trajectories and a Reinforcement Learning (RL) stage to optimize for decision accuracy and tool-use efficiency. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that RecThinker consistently outperforms strong baselines in the recommendation scenario.
Reliable evaluation is essential for developing and deploying large language models, yet in practice it often requires substantial manual effort: practitioners must identify appropriate benchmarks, reproduce heterogeneous evaluation codebases, configure dataset schema mappings, and interpret aggregated metrics. To address these challenges, we present One-Eval, an agentic evaluation system that converts natural-language evaluation requests into executable, traceable, and customizable evaluation workflows. One-Eval integrates (i) NL2Bench for intent structuring and personalized benchmark planning, (ii) BenchResolve for benchmark resolution, automatic dataset acquisition, and schema normalization to ensure executability, and (iii) Metrics \& Reporting for task-aware metric selection and decision-oriented reporting beyond scalar scores. The system further incorporates human-in-the-loop checkpoints for review, editing, and rollback, while preserving sample evidence trails for debugging and auditability. Experiments show that One-Eval can execute end-to-end evaluations from diverse natural-language requests with minimal user effort, supporting more efficient and reproducible evaluation in industrial settings. Our framework is publicly available at https://github.com/OpenDCAI/One-Eval.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used across the scientific workflow, including to draft peer-review reports. However, many AI-generated reviews are superficial and insufficiently actionable, leaving authors without concrete, implementable guidance and motivating the gap this work addresses. We propose RbtAct, which targets actionable review feedback generation and places existing peer review rebuttal at the center of learning. Rebuttals show which reviewer comments led to concrete revisions or specific plans, and which were only defended. Building on this insight, we leverage rebuttal as implicit supervision to directly optimize a feedback generator for actionability. To support this objective, we propose a new task called perspective-conditioned segment-level review feedback generation, in which the model is required to produce a single focused comment based on the complete paper and a specified perspective such as experiments and writing. We also build a large dataset named RMR-75K that maps review segments to the rebuttal segments that address them, with perspective labels and impact categories that order author uptake. We then train the Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model with supervised fine-tuning on review segments followed by preference optimization using rebuttal derived pairs. Experiments with human experts and LLM-as-a-judge show consistent gains in actionability and specificity over strong baselines while maintaining grounding and relevance.
Current evaluation frameworks and benchmarks for LLM powered agents focus on text chat driven agents, these frameworks do not expose the persona of user to the agent, thus operating in a user agnostic environment. Importantly, in customer experience management domain, the agent's behaviour evolves as the agent learns about user personality. With proliferation of real time TTS and multi-modal language models, LLM based agents are gradually going to become multi-modal. Towards this, we propose the MM-tau-p$^2$ benchmark with metrics for evaluating the robustness of multi-modal agents in dual control setting with and without persona adaption of user, while also taking user inputs in the planning process to resolve a user query. In particular, our work shows that even with state of-the-art frontier LLMs like GPT-5, GPT 4.1, there are additional considerations measured using metrics viz. multi-modal robustness, turn overhead while introducing multi-modality into LLM based agents. Overall, MM-tau-p$^2$ builds on our prior work FOCAL and provides a holistic way of evaluating multi-modal agents in an automated way by introducing 12 novel metrics. We also provide estimates of these metrics on the telecom and retail domains by using the LLM-as-judge approach using carefully crafted prompts with well defined rubrics for evaluating each conversation.
LLM agents that store knowledge as natural language suffer steep retrieval degradation as condition count grows, often struggle to compose learned rules reliably, and typically lack explicit mechanisms to detect stale or adversarial knowledge. We introduce PRECEPT, a unified framework for test-time adaptation with three tightly coupled components: (1) deterministic exact-match rule retrieval over structured condition keys, (2) conflict-aware memory with Bayesian source reliability and threshold-based rule invalidation, and (3) COMPASS, a Pareto-guided prompt-evolution outer loop. Exact retrieval eliminates partial-match interpretation errors on the deterministic path (0% by construction, vs 94.4% under Theorem~B.6's independence model at N=10) and supports compositional stacking through a semantic tier hierarchy; conflict-aware memory resolves static--dynamic disagreements and supports drift adaptation; COMPASS evaluates prompts through the same end-to-end execution pipeline. Results (9--10 seeds): PRECEPT achieves a +41.1pp first-try advantage over Full Reflexion (d>1.9), +33.3pp compositional generalization (d=1.55), 100% $P_1$ on 2-way logistics compositions (d=2.64), +40--55pp continuous learning gains, strong eventual robustness under adversarial static knowledge (100% logistics with adversarial SK active; partial recovery on integration), +55.0pp drift recovery (d=0.95, p=0.031), and 61% fewer steps. Core comparisons are statistically significant, often at p<0.001.
The high cost of collecting real-robot data has made robotic simulation a scalable platform for both evaluation and data generation. Yet most existing benchmarks concentrate on simple manipulation tasks such as pick-and-place, failing to capture the non-Markovian characteristics of real-world tasks and the complexity of articulated object interactions. To address this limitation, we present RuleSafe, a new articulated manipulation benchmark built upon a scalable LLM-aided simulation framework. RuleSafe features safes with diverse unlocking mechanisms, such as key locks, password locks, and logic locks, which require different multi-stage reasoning and manipulation strategies. These LLM-generated rules produce non-Markovian and long-horizon tasks that require temporal modeling and memory-based reasoning. We further propose VQ-Memory, a compact and structured temporal representation that uses vector-quantized variational autoencoders (VQ-VAEs) to encode past proprioceptive states into discrete latent tokens. This representation filters low-level noise while preserving high-level task-phase context, providing lightweight yet robust temporal cues that are compatible with existing Vision-Language-Action models (VLA). Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art VLA models and diffusion policies show that VQ-Memory consistently improves long-horizon planning, enhances generalization to unseen configurations, and enables more efficient manipulation with reduced computational cost. Project page: vqmemory.github.io
We present GenePlan (GENeralized Evolutionary Planner), a novel framework that leverages large language model (LLM) assisted evolutionary algorithms to generate domain-dependent generalized planners for classical planning tasks described in PDDL. By casting generalized planning as an optimization problem, GenePlan iteratively evolves interpretable Python planners that minimize plan length across diverse problem instances. In empirical evaluation across six existing benchmark domains and two new domains, GenePlan achieved an average SAT score of 0.91, closely matching the performance of the state-of-the-art planners (SAT score 0.93), and significantly outperforming other LLM-based baselines such as chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting (average SAT score 0.64). The generated planners solve new instances rapidly (average 0.49 seconds per task) and at low cost (average $1.82 per domain using GPT-4o).
Agents must infer action outcomes and select actions that maximize a reward signal indicating how close the goal is to being reached. Supervised learning of reward models could introduce biases inherent to training data, limiting generalization to novel goals and environments. In this paper, we investigate whether well-defined world state representations alone can enable accurate reward prediction across domains. To address this, we introduce StateFactory, a factorized representation method that transforms unstructured observations into a hierarchical object-attribute structure using language models. This structured representation allows rewards to be estimated naturally as the semantic similarity between the current state and the goal state under hierarchical constraint. Overall, the compact representation structure induced by StateFactory enables strong reward generalization capabilities. We evaluate on RewardPrediction, a new benchmark dataset spanning five diverse domains and comprising 2,454 unique action-observation trajectories with step-wise ground-truth rewards. Our method shows promising zero-shot results against both VLWM-critic and LLM-as-a-Judge reward models, achieving 60% and 8% lower EPIC distance, respectively. Furthermore, this superior reward quality successfully translates into improved agent planning performance, yielding success rate gains of +21.64% on AlfWorld and +12.40% on ScienceWorld over reactive system-1 policies and enhancing system-2 agent planning. Project Page: https://statefactory.github.io