While Large Language Models (LLMs) have empowered AI research agents to perform isolated scientific tasks, automating complex, real-world workflows, such as LLM training, remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we introduce TREX, a multi-agent system that automates the entire LLM training life-cycle. By orchestrating collaboration between two core modules-the Researcher and the Executor-the system seamlessly performs requirement analysis, open-domain literature and data research, formulation of training strategies, preparation of data recipes, and model training and evaluation. The multi-round experimental process is modeled as a search tree, enabling the system to efficiently plan exploration paths, reuse historical results, and distill high-level insights from iterative trials. To evaluate the capability of automated LLM training, we construct FT-Bench, a benchmark comprising 10 tasks derived from real-world scenarios, ranging from optimizing fundamental model capabilities to enhancing performance on domain-specific tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that the TREX agent consistently optimizes model performance on target tasks.
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Geographic Information Systems (GIS) marks a paradigm shift toward autonomous spatial analysis. However, evaluating these LLM-based agents remains challenging due to the complex, multi-step nature of geospatial workflows. Existing benchmarks primarily rely on static text or code matching, neglecting dynamic runtime feedback and the multimodal nature of spatial outputs. To address this gap, we introduce GeoAgentBench (GABench), a dynamic and interactive evaluation benchmark tailored for tool-augmented GIS agents. GABench provides a realistic execution sandbox integrating 117 atomic GIS tools, encompassing 53 typical spatial analysis tasks across 6 core GIS domains. Recognizing that precise parameter configuration is the primary determinant of execution success in dynamic GIS environments, we designed the Parameter Execution Accuracy (PEA) metric, which utilizes a "Last-Attempt Alignment" strategy to quantify the fidelity of implicit parameter inference. Complementing this, a Vision-Language Model (VLM) based verification is proposed to assess data-spatial accuracy and cartographic style adherence. Furthermore, to address the frequent task failures caused by parameter misalignments and runtime anomalies, we developed a novel agent architecture, Plan-and-React, that mimics expert cognitive workflows by decoupling global orchestration from step-wise reactive execution. Extensive experiments with seven representative LLMs demonstrate that the Plan-and-React paradigm significantly outperforms traditional frameworks, achieving the optimal balance between logical rigor and execution robustness, particularly in multi-step reasoning and error recovery. Our findings highlight current capability boundaries and establish a robust standard for assessing and advancing the next generation of autonomous GeoAI.
The next generation of autonomous AI systems will be constrained not only by model capability, but by how intelligence is structured across heterogeneous hardware. Current paradigms -- cloud-centric AI, on-device inference, and edge-cloud pipelines -- treat planning, reasoning, and execution as a monolithic process, leading to unnecessary latency, energy consumption, and fragmented behavioral continuity. We introduce the Tri-Spirit Architecture, a three-layer cognitive framework that decomposes intelligence into planning (Super Layer), reasoning (Agent Layer), and execution (Reflex Layer), each mapped to distinct compute substrates and coordinated via an asynchronous message bus. We formalize the system with a parameterized routing policy, a habit-compilation mechanism that promotes repeated reasoning paths into zero-inference execution policies, a convergent memory model, and explicit safety constraints. We evaluate the architecture in a reproducible simulation of 2000 synthetic tasks against cloud-centric and edge-only baselines. Tri-Spirit reduces mean task latency by 75.6 percent and energy consumption by 71.1 percent, while decreasing LLM invocations by 30 percent and enabling 77.6 percent offline task completion. These results suggest that cognitive decomposition, rather than model scaling alone, is a primary driver of system-level efficiency in AI hardware.
Large language models (LLMs) open new possibilities for agentic control in Open RAN, allowing operators to express intents in natural language while delegating low-level execution to autonomous agents. We present A1gent, an agentic RAN control stack that decouples reasoning from real-time actuation. A non-RT agentic rApp compiles operator goals into typed A1 policy instances, and three task-oriented near-RT agentic xApps enforce them through a deterministic loop with plane-scoped actuation - E2 for mobility and load steering, and O1 for energy orchestration. This agentic reasoning-execution split ensures auditable coordination between RAN intelligent controller (RIC) tiers, supported by encoded guardrails and a fixed-priority action merger for conflict governance. A training-free adaptive policy tuner then refines bounded parameters using KPI memory without retraining, sustaining predictable adaptation. By integrating intent-driven planning with deterministic near-RT execution, A1gent advances Open RAN toward verifiable, self-governing, and reproducible agentic intelligence.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly described as possessing strong reasoning capabilities, supported by high performance on mathematical, logical, and planning benchmarks. However, most existing evaluations rely on aggregate accuracy over fixed datasets, obscuring how reasoning behavior evolves as task complexity increases. In this work, we introduce a controlled benchmarking framework to systematically evaluate the robustness of reasoning in Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) under progressively increasing problem complexity. We construct a suite of nine classical reasoning tasks: Boolean Satisfiability, Cryptarithmetic, Graph Coloring, River Crossing, Tower of Hanoi, Water Jug, Checker Jumping, Sudoku, and Rubik's Cube, each parameterized to precisely control complexity while preserving underlying semantics. Using deterministic validators, we evaluate multiple open and proprietary LRMs across low, intermediate, and high complexity regimes, ensuring that only fully valid solutions are accepted. Our results reveal a consistent phase transition like behavior: models achieve high accuracy at low complexity but degrade sharply beyond task specific complexity thresholds. We formalize this phenomenon as reasoning collapse. Across tasks, we observe substantial accuracy declines, often exceeding 50%, accompanied by inconsistent reasoning traces, constraint violations, loss of state tracking, and confidently incorrect outputs. Increased reasoning length does not reliably improve correctness, and gains in one problem family do not generalize to others. These findings highlight the need for evaluation methodologies that move beyond static benchmarks and explicitly measure reasoning robustness under controlled complexity.
Autonomous web agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in completing complex browser tasks, yet they still struggle with long-horizon workflows. A key bottleneck is the grounding gap in existing skill formulations: textual workflow skills provide natural language guidance but cannot be directly executed, while code-based skills are executable but opaque to the agent, offering no step-level understanding for error recovery or adaptation. We introduce WebXSkill, a framework that bridges this gap with executable skills, each pairing a parameterized action program with step-level natural language guidance, enabling both direct execution and agent-driven adaptation. WebXSkill operates in three stages: skill extraction mines reusable action subsequences from readily available synthetic agent trajectories and abstracts them into parameterized skills, skill organization indexes skills into a URL-based graph for context-aware retrieval, and skill deployment exposes two complementary modes, grounded mode for fully automated multi-step execution and guided mode where skills serve as step-by-step instructions that the agent follows with its native planning. On WebArena and WebVoyager, WebXSkill improves task success rate by up to 9.8 and 12.9 points over the baseline, respectively, demonstrating the effectiveness of executable skills for web agents. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/aiming-lab/WebXSkill.
The globalization of integrated circuit (IC) design and manufacturing has increased the exposure of hardware intellectual property (IP) to untrusted stages of the supply chain, raising concerns about reverse engineering, piracy, tampering, and overbuilding. Hardware netlist obfuscation is a promising countermeasure, but automating the generation of functionally correct and security-relevant obfuscated circuits remains challenging, particularly for benchmark-scale designs. This paper presents an agentic, large language model (LLM)-driven framework for automated hardware netlist obfuscation. The proposed framework combines retrieval-grounded planning, structured lock-plan generation, deterministic netlist compilation, functional verification, and SAT-based security evaluation. Rather than a single prompt-to-output generation step, the framework decomposes the task into specialized stages for circuit analysis, synthesis, verification, and attack evaluation. We evaluate the framework on ISCAS-85 benchmarks using functional equivalence checking and SAT-based attacks. Results show that the framework generates correct locked netlists while introducing measurable output corruption under incorrect keys, while SAT attacks remain effective. These findings highlight both the potential and current limitations of agentic LLM-driven obfuscation.
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly generate indoor scenes through intermediate structures such as layouts and scene graphs, yet evaluation still relies on LLM or VLM judges that score rendered views, making judgments sensitive to viewpoint, prompt phrasing, and hallucination. When the evaluator is unstable, it becomes difficult to determine whether a model has produced a spatially plausible scene or whether the output score reflects the choice of viewpoint, rendering, or prompt. We introduce SceneCritic, a symbolic evaluator for floor-plan-level layouts. SceneCritic's constraints are grounded in SceneOnto, a structured spatial ontology we construct by aggregating indoor scene priors from 3D-FRONT, ScanNet, and Visual Genome. SceneOnto traverses this ontology to jointly verify semantic, orientation, and geometric coherence across object relationships, providing object-level and relationship-level assessments that identify specific violations and successful placements. Furthermore, we pair SceneCritic with an iterative refinement test bed that probes how models build and revise spatial structure under different critic modalities: a rule-based critic using collision constraints as feedback, an LLM critic operating on the layout as text, and a VLM critic operating on rendered observations. Through extensive experiments, we show that (a) SceneCritic aligns substantially better with human judgments than VLM-based evaluators, (b) text-only LLMs can outperform VLMs on semantic layout quality, and (c) image-based VLM refinement is the most effective critic modality for semantic and orientation correction.
Instruction-tuned large language models produce helpful, structured responses, but how robust is this helpfulness when trivially constrained? We show that simple lexical constraints (banning a single punctuation character or common word) cause instruction-tuned LLMs to collapse their responses, losing 14--48% of comprehensiveness in pairwise evaluation across three open-weight model families and one closed-weight model (GPT-4o-mini). The baseline response is preferred in 77--100% of 1,920 pairwise comparisons judged by GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4o. Notably, GPT-4o-mini suffers 31% comprehensiveness loss (99% baseline win rate), demonstrating that the fragility extends to commercially deployed closed-weight models, contrary to prior findings on format-level constraints. Through mechanistic analysis, we identify this as a planning failure: two-pass generation (free generation followed by constrained rewriting) recovers 59--96% of response length, and linear probes on prompt representations predict response length with $R^2 = 0.51$--$0.93$ before generation begins, with $R^2$ tracking collapse severity across models. The same probes yield negative $R^2$ on base models, confirming that instruction tuning creates the representational structure encoding the collapse decision. Crucially, base models show no systematic collapse under identical constraints, with effects that are small, noisy, and bidirectional, demonstrating that instruction tuning creates this fragility by coupling task competence to narrow surface-form templates. The effect replicates on MT-Bench across all eight task categories. We further show that standard independent LLM-as-judge evaluation detects only a 3.5% average quality drop where pairwise evaluation reveals 23%, exposing a methodological blind spot in how constrained generation is assessed.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) typically relies on a flat retrieval paradigm that maps queries directly to static, isolated text segments. This approach struggles with more complex tasks that require the conditional retrieval and dynamic synthesis of information across different levels of granularity (e.g., from broad concepts to specific evidence). To bridge this gap, we introduce NaviRAG, a novel framework that shifts from passive segment retrieval to active knowledge navigation. NaviRAG first structures the knowledge documents into a hierarchical form, preserving semantic relationships from coarse-grained topics to fine-grained details. Leveraging this reorganized knowledge records, a large language model (LLM) agent actively navigates the records, iteratively identifying information gaps and retrieving relevant content from the most appropriate granularity level. Extensive experiments on long-document QA benchmarks show that NaviRAG consistently improves both retrieval recall and end-to-end answer performance over conventional RAG baselines. Ablation studies confirm performance gains stem from our method's capacity for multi-granular evidence localization and dynamic retrieval planning. We further discuss efficiency, applicable scenario, and future directions of our method, hoping to make RAG systems more intelligent and autonomous.
We introduce ARGOS, the first benchmark and framework that reformulates multi-camera person search as an interactive reasoning problem requiring an agent to plan, question, and eliminate candidates under information asymmetry. An ARGOS agent receives a vague witness statement and must decide what to ask, when to invoke spatial or temporal tools, and how to interpret ambiguous responses, all within a limited turn budget. Reasoning is grounded in a Spatio-Temporal Topology Graph (STTG) encoding camera connectivity and empirically validated transition times. The benchmark comprises 2,691 tasks across 14 real-world scenarios in three progressive tracks: semantic perception (Who), spatial reasoning (Where), and temporal reasoning (When). Experiments with four LLM backbones show the benchmark is far from solved (best TWS: 0.383 on Track 2, 0.590 on Track 3), and ablations confirm that removing domain-specific tools drops accuracy by up to 49.6 percentage points.
LLMs can perform seemingly planning-intensive tasks, like writing coherent stories or functioning code, without explicitly verbalizing a plan; however, the extent to which they implicitly plan is unknown. In this paper, we define latent planning as occurring when LLMs possess internal planning representations that (1) cause the generation of a specific future token or concept, and (2) shape preceding context to license said future token or concept. We study the Qwen-3 family (0.6B-14B) on simple planning tasks, finding that latent planning ability increases with scale. Models that plan possess features that represent a planned-for word like "accountant", and cause them to output "an" rather than "a"; moreover, even the less-successful Qwen-3 4B-8B have nascent planning mechanisms. On the more complex task of completing rhyming couplets, we find that models often identify a rhyme ahead of time, but even large models seldom plan far ahead. However, we can elicit some planning that increases with scale when steering models towards planned words in prose. In sum, we offer a framework for measuring planning and mechanistic evidence of how models' planning abilities grow with scale.
This paper addresses two limitations of large language models (LLMs) in solving complex problems: (1) their reasoning processes exhibit Bayesian-like stochastic generation, where each token is sampled from a context-dependent probability distribution, leading to inherently random decision trajectories rather than deterministic planning; (2) the reasoning and decision-making mechanisms are statically decoupled, meaning dynamically retrieved domain knowledge fails to dynamically adjust the underlying reasoning strategy. These dual deficiencies result in initial decisions lacking strategic anchoring and reasoning chains often failing to converge on correct solutions, as stochastic generation lacks mechanisms for trajectory correction or knowledge-guided optimization during sequential reasoning. To resolve these issues, we propose a problem-solving method integrated into the LLM's generation process to guide reasoning. This method, compatible with numerous LLMs and featuring reusable solutions, is grounded in a novel Heuristic-Classification-of-Thoughts prompting schema (HCoT). HCoT synergizes the LLM's reasoning ability with a structured problem space via a heuristic classification model that controls the reasoning process and provides reusable abstract solutions. Evaluated on two complex inductive reasoning tasks with ill-defined search spaces, HCoT outperforms existing approaches (e.g., Tree-of-Thoughts and Chain-of-Thoughts prompting) in performance. On the well-structured 24 Game task, HCoT demonstrates significantly higher token efficiency compared to the state-of-the-art Tree-of-Thoughts-Breadth-First-Search. In terms of both accuracy and token usage, HCoT achieves a Pareto frontier balance, offering a strong trade-off between performance and computational cost.
Climate decision-making in the Gulf increasingly demands systems that can translate heterogeneous scientific and policy evidence into actionable guidance, yet general-purpose large language models (LLMs) remain weak both in region-specific climate knowledge and grounded interaction with geospatial and forecasting tools. We present the GCA framework, which unifies (i) GCA-DS, a curated Gulf-focused multimodal dataset, and (ii) Gulf Climate Agent (GCA), a tool-augmented agent for climate analysis. GCA-DS comprises ~200k question-answer pairs spanning governmental policies and adaptation plans, NGO and international frameworks, academic literature, and event-driven reporting on heatwaves, dust storms, and floods, complemented with remote-sensing inputs that couple imagery with textual evidence. Building on this foundation, the GCA agent orchestrates a modular tool pipeline grounded in real-time and historical signals and geospatial processing that produces derived indices and interpretable visualizations. Finally, we benchmark open and proprietary LLMs on Gulf climate tasks and show that domain fine-tuning and tool integration substantially improve reliability over general-purpose baselines.
Clinical research involves labor-intensive processes such as study design, cohort construction, model development, and documentation, requiring domain expertise, programming skills, and access to sensitive patient data. These demands create barriers for clinicians and external researchers conducting data-driven studies. To overcome these limitations, we developed a Clinical Agentic Research Intelligence System (CARIS) that automates the clinical research workflow while preserving data privacy, enabling comprehensive studies without direct access to raw data. CARIS integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with modular tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling natural language-driven orchestration of appropriate tools. Databases remain securely within the MCP server, and users access only the outputs and final research reports. Based on user intent, CARIS automatically executes the full pipeline: research planning, literature search, cohort construction, Institutional Review Board (IRB) documentation, Vibe Machine Learning (ML), and report generation, with iterative human-in-the-loop refinement. We evaluated CARIS on three heterogeneous datasets with distinct clinical tasks. Research plans and IRB documents were finalized within three to four iterations, using evidence from literature and data. The system supported Vibe ML by exploring feature-model combinations, ranking the top ten models, and generating performance visualizations. Final reports showed high completeness based on a checklist derived from the TRIPOD+AI framework, achieving 96% coverage in LLM evaluation and 82% in human evaluation. CARIS demonstrates that agentic AI can transform clinical hypotheses into executable research workflows across heterogeneous datasets. By eliminating the need for coding and direct data access, the system lowers barriers and bridges public and private clinical data environments.
Recent autonomous LLM agents have demonstrated end-to-end automation of machine-learning research. Real-world physical science is intrinsically harder, requiring deep reasoning bounded by physical truth and, because real systems are too complex to study in isolation, almost always built on existing literature. We focus on the smallest meaningful unit of such research, a mini research loop in which an agent reads a paper, reproduces it, critiques it, and extends it. We test this loop in two complementary regimes: scale and depth. At scale, across 111 open-access computational physics papers, an agent autonomously runs the read-plan-compute-compare loop and, without being asked to critique, raises substantive concerns on ~42% of papers - 97.7% of which require execution to surface. In depth, for one Nature Communications paper on multiscale simulation of a 2D-material MOSFET, the agent runs new calculations missing from the original and produces, unsupervised, a publishable Comment -- composed, figured, typeset, and PDF-iterated -- that revises the paper's headline conclusion.
Agents aspire to eliminate the need for task-specific prompt crafting through autonomous reason-act-observe loops. Still, they are commonly instructed to follow a task-specific plan for guidance, e.g., to resolve software issues following phases for navigation, reproduction, patch, and validation. Unfortunately, it is unknown to what extent agents actually follow such instructed plans. Without such an analysis, determining the extent agents comply with a given plan, it is impossible to assess whether a solution was reached through correct strategic reasoning or through other means, e.g., data contamination or overfitting to a benchmark. This paper presents the first extensive, systematic analysis of plan compliance in programming agents, examining 16,991 trajectories from SWE-agent across four LLMs on SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro under eight plan variations. Without an explicit plan, agents fall back on workflows internalized during training, which are often incomplete, overfit, or inconsistently applied. Providing the standard plan improves issue resolution, and we observe that periodic plan reminders can mitigate plan violations and improve task success. A subpar plan hurts performance even more than no plan at all. Surprisingly, augmenting a plan with additional task-relevant phases in the early stage can degrade performance, particularly when these phases do not align with the model's internal problem-solving strategy. These findings highlight a research gap: fine-tuning paradigms that teach models to follow instructed plans, rather than encoding task-specific plans in them. This requires teaching models to reason and act adaptively, rather than memorizing workflows.
The management of radio frequency spectrum is undergoing a paradigm shift from static, centralized command-and-control models to dynamic, market-driven approaches. However, the realization of Dynamic Spectrum Management has been hindered by the lack of an automated, trustworthy, and intelligent coordination infrastructure that can operate without a central authority while preserving participant privacy. In this paper, we introduce BLAST (Blockchain-based LLM-powered Agentic Spectrum Trading), a comprehensive framework that integrates Large Language Model (LLM) Agents with a permissioned blockchain infrastructure to create a fully autonomous, private, and secure spectrum trading ecosystem. We propose a novel agent architecture that implements the Cognitive Radio cycle through a sequential decision pipeline (perceive, plan, act) enabling agents to reason strategically about economic value and market dynamics. We evaluate the framework through three distinct market mechanisms: Direct Sale, First-Price Sealed-Bid, and Second-Price (Vickrey) Sealed-Bid auctions. Experimental results demonstrate that the Second-Price (Vickrey) auction is the optimal choice for maximizing social welfare and allocative efficiency, capturing up to 71% of the theoretical surplus by incentivizing truthful bidding. We also compare the proposed model against a baseline non-LLM heuristic agentic model and show that utilizing LLM agents yields significant improvements in market competition, reduced wealth and asset concentration, and increased system welfare. Furthermore, we validate the system's privacy preservation, confirming that sensitive bid values remain isolated in private data collections while only cryptographic hashes are committed to the public ledger.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced tool-augmented agents, enabling autonomous reasoning via API interactions. However, executing multi-step tasks within massive tool libraries remains challenging due to two critical bottlenecks: (1) the absence of rigorous, plan-level evaluation frameworks and (2) the computational demand of exploring vast decision spaces stemming from large toolsets and long-horizon planning. To bridge these gaps, we first introduce SLATE (Synthetic Large-scale API Toolkit for E-commerce), a large-scale context-aware benchmark designed for the automated assessment of tool-integrated agents. Unlike static metrics, SLATE accommodates diverse yet functionally valid execution trajectories, revealing that current agents struggle with self-correction and search efficiency. Motivated by these findings, we next propose Entropy-Guided Branching (EGB), an uncertainty-aware search algorithm that dynamically expands decision branches where predictive entropy is high. EGB optimizes the exploration-exploitation trade-off, significantly enhancing both task success rates and computational efficiency. Extensive experiments on SLATE demonstrate that our dual contribution provides a robust foundation for developing reliable and scalable LLM agents in tool-rich environments.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as tool-augmented agents capable of executing system-level operations. While existing benchmarks primarily assess textual alignment or task success, less attention has been paid to the structural relationship between linguistic signaling and executable behavior under varying autonomy scaffolds. This study introduces an execution-layer be-havioral measurement approach based on a two-dimensional A-R space defined by Action Rate (A) and Refusal Signal (R), with Divergence (D) capturing coor-dination between the two. Models are evaluated across four normative regimes (Control, Gray, Dilemma, and Malicious) and three autonomy configurations (di-rect execution, planning, and reflection). Rather than assigning aggregate safety scores, the method characterizes how execution and refusal redistribute across contextual framing and scaffold depth. Empirical results show that execution and refusal constitute separable behavioral dimensions whose joint distribution varies systematically across regimes and autonomy levels. Reflection-based scaffolding often shifts configurations toward higher refusal in risk-laden contexts, but redis-tribution patterns differ structurally across models. The A-R representation makes cross-sectional behavioral profiles, scaffold-induced transitions, and coordination variability directly observable. By foregrounding execution-layer characterization over scalar ranking, this work provides a deployment-oriented lens for analyzing and selecting tool-enabled LLM agents in organizational settings where execution privileges and risk tolerance vary.
Entity alignment (EA) aims to identify entities across different knowledge graphs (KGs) that refer to the same real-world object and plays a critical role in knowledge fusion and integration. Traditional EA methods mainly rely on knowledge representation learning, but their performance is often limited under noisy or sparsely supervised scenarios. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been introduced to EA and achieved notable improvements by leveraging rich semantic knowledge. However, existing LLM-based EA approaches typically treat LLMs as black-box decision makers, resulting in limited interpretability, and the direct use of large-scale triples substantially increases inference cost. To address these challenges, we propose \textbf{EA-Agent}, a reasoning-driven agent for EA. EA-Agent formulates EA as a structured reasoning process with multi-step planning and execution, enabling interpretable alignment decisions. Within this process, it introduces attribute and relation triple selectors to filter redundant triples before feeding them into the LLM, effectively addressing efficiency challenges. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that EA-Agent consistently outperforms existing EA methods and achieves state-of-the-art performance. The source code is available at https://github.com/YXNan0110/EA-Agent.
The dominant paradigm for building LLM based agents is the Agent Loop, an iterative cycle where a single language model decides what to do next by reading an ever growing context window. This paradigm has three structural weaknesses: implicit dependencies between steps, unbounded recovery loops, and mutable execution history that complicates debugging. We characterize the Agent Loop as a single ready unit scheduler: at any moment, at most one executable unit is active, and the choice of which unit to activate comes from opaque LLM inference rather than an inspectable policy. This perspective places Agent Loops and graph based execution engines on a single semantic continuum. We propose SGH, Structured Graph Harness, which lifts control flow from implicit context into an explicit static DAG. SGH makes three commitments: execution plans are immutable within a plan version, planning execution and recovery are separated into three layers, and recovery follows a strict escalation protocol. These choices trade some expressiveness for controllability, verifiability, and implementability. Our contributions are fourfold: a scheduler unified framework that applies classical scheduling theory to LLM agent execution and identifies challenges introduced by non deterministic LLM nodes; a trade off analysis of controllability, expressiveness, and implementability across 70 surveyed systems; a formal specification including a node state machine with termination and soundness guarantees; and an attributable experimental framework with a seven group design for future validation. This is a position paper and design proposal. We provide a theoretical framework, design analysis, and experimental protocol, not a production implementation or empirical results.
LLM agents now perform strongly in software engineering, deep research, GUI automation, and various other applications, while recent agent scaffolds and models are increasingly integrating these capabilities into unified systems. Yet, most evaluations still test these capabilities in isolation, which leaves a gap for more diverse use cases that require agents to combine different capabilities. We introduce CocoaBench, a benchmark for unified digital agents built from human-designed, long-horizon tasks that require flexible composition of vision, search, and coding. Tasks are specified only by an instruction and an automatic evaluation function over the final output, enabling reliable and scalable evaluation across diverse agent infrastructures. We also present CocoaAgent, a lightweight shared scaffold for controlled comparison across model backbones. Experiments show that current agents remain far from reliable on CocoaBench, with the best evaluated system achieving only 45.1% success rate. Our analysis further points to substantial room for improvement in reasoning and planning, tool use and execution, and visual grounding.
Semiconductor supply chains face unprecedented resilience challenges amidst global geopolitical turbulence. Conventional Large Language Model (LLM) planners, when confronting such non-stationary "Policy Black Swan" events, frequently suffer from Decision Paralysis or a severe Grounding Gap due to the absence of physical environmental modeling. This paper introduces ReflectiChain, a cognitive agentic framework tailored for resilient macroeconomic supply chain planning. The core innovation lies in the integration of Latent Trajectory Rehearsal powered by a generative world model, which couples reflection-in-action (System 2 deliberation) with delayed reflection-on-action. Furthermore, we leverage a Retrospective Agentic RL mechanism to enable autonomous policy evolution during the deployment phase (test-time). Evaluations conducted on our high-fidelity benchmark, Semi-Sim, demonstrate that under extreme scenarios such as export bans and material shortages, ReflectiChain achieves a 250% improvement in average step rewards over the strongest LLM baselines. It successfully restores the Operability Ratio (OR) from a deficient 13.3% to over 88.5% while ensuring robust gradient convergence. Ablation studies further underscore that the synergy between physical grounding constraints and double-loop learning is fundamental to bridging the gap between semantic reasoning and physical reality for long-horizon strategic planning.
Agentic Web is an emerging paradigm where autonomous agents help users use online information. As the paradigm develops, content providers are also deploying agents to manage their data and serve it through controlled interfaces. This shift moves information access from centralized retrieval to decentralized coordination. To study this setting, we introduce AgentWebBench, a benchmark that evaluates how well a user agent synthesizes answers by interacting with website-specific content agents. We evaluate four tasks that cover common web information needs, spanning ranked retrieval (web search, web recommendation) and open-ended synthesis (question answering, deep research). Across seven advanced LLMs and three coordination strategies, multi-agent coordination generally lags behind centralized retrieval as expected, because user agent cannot directly access the corpus, but the gap shrinks with model scale and can even outperform centralized retrieval on question answering. This benchmark also enables us to study properties of the emerging paradigm of the digital world. We find that decentralized access concentrates traffic toward a small set of websites, test time scaling improves both interaction reliability and task performance, and strong results require sufficient interactions guided by careful planning. Finally, our failure analysis suggests that user agents need better planning and answer synthesis, while content agents need more reliable retrieval and evidence quality. Code, data, and APIs are released on https://github.com/cxcscmu/AgentWebBench.
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) provide robots with contextual reasoning abilities to comprehend human instructions. Yet, current LLM-enabled robots typically depend on cloud-based models or high-performance computing infrastructure, which limit their deployment on robots under unreliable internet environments or with constrained computational resources, such as UAVs and small ground vehicles. Thus, deploying fine-tuned small language models (SLMs) that support onboard deployment offers a promising alternative. This paper introduces Ro-SLM, a framework that enables reliable SLM-driven robot operation by distilling LLMs' knowledge and reasoning. Ro-SLM starts from dataset synthesis by leveraging LLMs to generate diverse task instructions, produce corresponding ground truth code with minimal human assistance, and augment instructions into real-world application scenarios. Ro-SLM is then fine-tuned with the dataset, in which LLM serves as a reward function to guide the training. Extensive experiments on UAV operation tasks demonstrate that Ro-SLM improves the performance of SLM from being incapable of supporting robotic task planning and code generation to achieving performance that approaches LLM.
Enabling large language models to scale and reliably use hundreds of tools is critical for real-world applications, yet challenging due to the inefficiency and error accumulation inherent in flat tool-calling architectures. To address this, we propose Hybrid Toolset Agentization & Adaptation (HTAA), a hierarchical framework for scalable tool-use planning. We propose a novel toolset agentization paradigm, which encapsulates frequently co-used tools into specialized agent tools, thereby reducing the planner's action space and mitigating redundancy. To ensure effective coordination, we design Asymmetric Planner Adaptation, a trajectory-based training paradigm that aligns the high-level planner with agent tools via backward reconstruction and forward refinement. To validate the performance of HTAA, we conduct experiments on a real-world internal dataset, InfoVerify, based on the POI validation workflow of China's largest online large-scale ride-hailing platform, featuring long-horizon executable tool trajectories. Experiments on InfoVerify and widely-used benchmarks show that HTAA consistently achieves higher task success rates, requires short tool calling trajectories, and significantly reduces context overhead compared to strong baselines. Furthermore, in a production deployment, HTAA substantially reduces manual validation effort and operational cost, demonstrating its practical efficacy.
Foundation models have shown remarkable performance across diverse tasks, yet their ability to construct internal spatial world models for reasoning and planning remains unclear. We systematically evaluate the spatial understanding of large language models through maze tasks, a controlled testing context requiring multi-step planning and spatial abstraction. Across comprehensive experiments with Gemini-2.5-Flash, GPT-5-mini, Claude-Haiku-4.5, and DeepSeek-Chat, we uncover significant discrepancies in spatial reasoning that challenge assumptions about LLM planning capabilities. Using chain-of-thought prompting, Gemini achieves 80-86% accuracy on smaller mazes (5x5 to 7x7 grids) with tokenized adjacency representations, but performance collapses to 16-34% with visual grid formats, which is a 2-5x difference, suggesting representation-dependent rather than format-invariant spatial reasoning. We further probe spatial understanding through sequential proximity questions and compositional distance comparisons. Despite achieving 96-99% semantic coverage in reasoning traces, models fail to leverage this understanding for consistent spatial computations, indicating that they treat each question independently rather than building cumulative spatial knowledge. Our findings based on the maze-solving tasks suggest that LLMs do not develop robust spatial world models, but rather exhibit representation-specific and prompting-dependent reasoning that succeeds only under narrow conditions. These results have critical implications for deploying foundation models in applications requiring spatial abstraction.
Although Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate proficiency in knowledge-intensive tasks, current interfaces frequently precipitate cognitive misalignment by failing to externalize users' underlying reasoning structures. Existing tools typically represent intent as "flat lists," thereby disregarding the causal dependencies and revisable assumptions inherent in human decision-making. We introduce CogInstrument, a system that represents user reasoning through cognitive motifs-compositional, revisable units comprising concepts linked by causal dependencies. CogInstrument extracts these motifs from natural language interactions and renders them as editable graphical structures to facilitate bidirectional alignment. This structural externalization enables both the user and the LLM to inspect, negotiate, and reconcile reasoning processes iteratively. A within-subjects study (N=12) demonstrates that CogInstrument explicitly surfaces implicit reasoning structures, facilitating more targeted revision and reusability over conventional LLM-based dialogue interfaces. By enabling users to verify the logical grounding of LLM outputs, CogInstrument significantly enhances user agency, trust, and structural control over the collaboration. This work formalizes cognitive motifs as a fundamental unit for human-LLM alignment, providing a novel framework for achieving structured, reasoning-based human-AI collaboration.
Modeling household-level trip generation is fundamental to accurate demand forecasting, traffic flow estimation, and urban system planning. Existing studies were mostly based on classical machine learning models with limited predictive capability, while recent LLM-based approaches have yet to incorporate behavioral theory or intra-household interaction dynamics, both of which are critical for modeling realistic collective travel decisions. To address these limitations, we propose a novel LLM-based framework, named Persona-Enriched Multi-Agent Negotiation for Travel (PEMANT), which first integrates behavioral theory for individualized persona modeling and then conducts household-level trip planning negotiations via a structured multi-agent conversation. Specifically, PEMANT transforms static sociodemographic attributes into coherent narrative profiles that explicitly encode household-level attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral controls, following our proposed Household-Aware Chain-of-Planned-Behavior (HA-CoPB) framework. Building on these theory-grounded personas, PEMANT captures real-world household decision negotiation via a structured two-phase multi-agent conversation framework with a novel persona-alignment control mechanism. Evaluated on both national and regional household travel survey datasets, PEMANT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art benchmarks across datasets.